Negotiation Slips Regarding the Gaza War

First, we understand the aspirations of our people in the Gaza Strip for any truce, even a temporary one that allows, first, the entry of food and the cessation of famine, and second, the stopping of daily deaths of dozens of people. All other issues, which might be more crucial such as: the release of Palestinian prisoners, the withdrawal of the occupation army from the Strip, the cessation of war, and who governs the Strip after the war ends, are mere details. As for issues of complete liberation, Jerusalem, settlement in the West Bank, the return of refugees, and a Palestinian state, they are outside the thinking of the Palestinians in the Strip and are not open for discussion in any negotiations conducted by Hamas.
Here, we reiterate and emphasize two slips related to negotiations regarding the so-called Gaza War:
The first: which we have previously written about and warned against is the fragmentation of the issue and the multiplicity of negotiation tracks, where the enemy has succeeded in that. Thus, negotiations about Gaza have no relation to what are called the constants of the Palestinian cause, and they are conducted separately from what is happening in the West Bank and Jerusalem, also far from the legitimate and sole representative title of the Palestinian people, which is the Palestine Liberation Organization.
The second: there is a major misleading operation concerning the so-called negotiations with Hamas. What is happening in Doha are (negotiations to impose dictates) or (honorable surrender) between Tel Aviv and Washington on one side,
and the references of the Hamas movement, which have seen a decline in Iran's influence; Qatar with Al Udeid base, and Turkey, a NATO member, along with the Muslim Brotherhood, which is controlled and directed by Western intelligence agencies.
Since any settlement or agreement resulting from any negotiations will be a product of the balance of power on the ground and in the field, what will result from the negotiations regarding Gaza will, unfortunately, be in favor of the enemy, even if Hamas claims otherwise or promotes the agreement as a victory for itself, as it has done in all previous rounds of wars.