Arabs and the Choice Between the Bad - Iran - and the Worse - America and Israel

Washington and Tel Aviv are not sincere in their narratives about the reason for the aggression against Iran, such as the claim that the goal is peace in the region and the world, or that Tehran is a state that supports terrorism and is likely to possess nuclear weapons. In reality, the two countries are the last to have the right to talk about peace or to care about the stability and security of the countries in the region, especially the Arab states.

On the other hand, Tehran's narrative is also incorrect regarding everything it has promoted since 1979 about its opposition to Washington, its quest to eliminate Israel, and its denial of ambitions in the region, particularly in the Gulf, which it insists on calling "the Persian Gulf." It is also not truthful in its claim to support the forces of resistance and change in the Arab world for the sake of the peoples; otherwise, why does it specifically direct support to Shiite forces or those who implement its policies?

The truth is that these parties are clashing in defense of their interests and to enhance their influence in the Middle East, all at the expense of the Arab countries, which are the subject of the conflict and not a party to it, and they must choose between the bad, which is Iran, and the worse, which is the American-Israeli alliance.

However, despite the damage Iran has inflicted on Arab countries, it is less than the threat posed by the American-Israeli alliance, especially if it triumphs in this latest confrontation.