Washington and Tel Aviv: Disputes or Maneuvers?

The original title of this short article was "American-Israeli Intelligence and Arab Stupidity," but I changed it to avoid an insult to the Arab identity, to which I still belong and take pride in.
The reason lies in the capability of the American-Israeli duo to create a flood of contradictory and ambiguous statements from both sides regarding what is happening in Gaza and the region in general. This has led Arab media outlets and their army of mercenaries to interpret and reinterpret every statement made by any American or Israeli official or any article in an Israeli or foreign newspaper, even if it is written by an obscure writer. Some analysts even assert that Israel has lost its sovereignty and decision-making power, and that disagreements could lead to a weakening of the strategic relationship between the two sides, with Washington potentially abandoning its strategic alliance with Tel Aviv in favor of new alliances with Gulf states, especially Riyadh!
When we describe the positions of these analysts as stupidity, it is because they built their analyses on the premise of coordination between Tel Aviv and Washington to distribute roles that ultimately benefit both.
For instance, was Trump's initiative imposed on Netanyahu and was it against Israel's interests? Or was it, conversely, an American tactic coordinated with Israel for the benefit of both parties? A confirmation of this can be seen in what has occurred and is currently happening on the ground in Gaza since the Sharm El-Sheikh meeting.
And was American intervention in the Lebanon War in favor of Lebanon and the so-called peace, or was it in favor of Israel? Does the deal for the 135 planes that Washington agreed to sell to Riyadh represent a strategic shift in the region against Israel's interests? Or is it a profitable financial deal for Washington, where the latter benefits, not Riyadh, and perhaps it was imposed by Washington on Riyadh, just as it imposed on the Gulf states all arms deals worth hundreds of billions? These are weapons that have never been used against Israel or American interests or America's allies, but only in wars against Arab countries, as seen with Iraq and Yemen?
Yes, there are differences between Trump and Netanyahu in dealing with certain issues, but Trump, as Netanyahu himself acknowledged, was the best American leader in serving Israel and even serving Netanyahu personally, defending him against corruption charges. Trump was the one who said that Israel’s area is small, and that is unacceptable! He was the one who first proposed the idea of relocating the residents of Gaza, who destroyed Iran's nuclear capabilities, and helped, in coordination with Turkey, Qatar, and jihadist terrorist groups, to ravage Syria and destroy all its military capabilities?
Yet, some media mercenaries, especially Al Jazeera, continue to analyze and theorize about the rift in Washington's relationship with Tel Aviv, talking about the breakthrough that Riyadh achieved in the balance of power in the Middle East!