Their goods were returned to them

I was surprised by Trump's accusation of ISIS for the attack on American forces in Syria because the organization was an American creation, as acknowledged by former American intelligence chiefs and politicians like Hillary Clinton. The emergence of ISIS leaders alongside the godfather of the Arab Spring, Senator McCain, and the French Jew Bernard-Henri Lévy is noteworthy; al-Baghdadi appeared before he became the leader of ISIS with McCain. An Iraqi prison that was specifically established by the Americans for prisoners served as a breeding ground for extremists, producing figures like Zarqawi and later al-Baghdadi, and then al-Julani, the current governor of Syria.

When ISIS expanded in Iraq, it surged with thousands of SUVs from Syria towards Iraq to take control of Mosul, while American eyes watched over them from the sky using helicopters until they reached Mosul, which was evacuated by Iraq's leader Nouri al-Maliki, a man of both America and Iran. There were fifty thousand soldiers inside who did not fire a shot and left military equipment enough to supply an army, thus they entered peacefully, with Turkey serving as their training and recruitment area.

Islam is greater and more sacred than to be confined within a narrow party. All groups and parties are products of Western colonialism, originating from the Wahhabi movement infused with radical ideas and customs from Jewish Talmudic extremism through Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab, passing through the Muslim Brotherhood, which was partly founded by the British chairman of the Suez Canal Authority, who provided Hassan al-Banna, of ambiguous origins, with funds to build the first center in Ismailia. He even gave him the organizational structure of the Irish Republican Army, setting up a public political organization and a secret military organization to strengthen the group and wage war against national currents demanding independence in Egypt after World War II.

The British followed the same path, convincing Muhammad Ali Jinnah, the leader of the Muslim League in India, to support the independence of Bangladesh and Pakistan from India, to prevent India from turning into the largest Islamic state in the world, a task that Mahatma Gandhi failed to achieve when trying to persuade him to keep India united.

Thus, all the groups and parties that called themselves Islamic emerged within a colonial policy to curb national movements and fragment the Islamic world, not to serve Islam. The journey of Hamas is a close example, as the occupation supported it in Gaza under the name of the Islamic Bloc, claiming it was established, as announced by its founders, to resist the secular current of the Palestine Liberation Organization, not to fight the occupation itself.

Even the Shiite Iranian revolution was a Western-American creation to counter the revolutionary current formed by the persistent opposition figure Ayatollah Taleghani against Reza Pahlavi and later his son Muhammad. His revolution called for the people to govern themselves constitutionally and did not believe in the guardianship of the jurist or other absurdities, and America adopted Khomeini, transporting him from Iraq to a villa in Paris owned by American intelligence. When the Shah tried to enlist the military to suppress the revolution, American General Hauser rushed to Tehran and ordered the military leaders not to intervene and told the Shah to leave, after which Taleghani was assassinated following the success of the revolution.

Hiding behind religion is the easiest way to win over the masses and the naïve. Even Trump announced in his election campaigns that he bets on the ignorance and stupidity of voters to win, disguising himself in religion with his opposition to abortion and raising the banner of family preservation despite his shameful behavior. A follower of the history and actions of Islamic groups finds that they act against Islam, as more than 99 percent of their victims are Muslims. They established their activities in the name of Islam for non-Islamic goals, serving both old and modern colonialism.