The Israeli Circular and American Policies Against China: The Global Technology Conflict and the Arab World Caught Between a Rock and a Hard Place

In a step that reflects the depth of dependency on American policies, the Israeli army recently issued a circular demanding its officers and soldiers to collect Chinese-made vehicles under the pretext of "security concerns" over camera and smart sensor systems. China is seen as an enemy being targeted. However, behind this decision lies something deeper than technical justifications; it is a direct reflection of the escalating American pressures aimed at excluding China from the global technology landscape and entrenching Western dominance over the keys to innovation and knowledge.

The United States justifies all its moves under the banner of "national security," but in reality, it is waging a new cold war with no other aim than to maintain its supremacy and slow down China's rise. Washington does not see China as a competitor in normal development but as an adversary that must be encircled and weakened. Hence, it imposes restrictions on technology exports, prevents cooperation with Chinese companies, and exerts economic and political pressures on its allies to force them to align with it, even at the expense of their sovereignty and interests. The recent Israeli circular is merely a microcosm of this policy that has turned Israeli decisions from sovereign acts into direct responses to Washington's dictates.

For decades, the United States has dealt with the Middle East using the same logic it applies to China today: control through hegemony rather than partnership. Under the banner of "democracy" and "human rights," it has supported corrupt regimes, shielded dictatorships, kept the peoples of the region in poverty and complete dependency on the West, plundered resources, nurtured wars, and ensured a continuous flow of oil and resources to its markets at prices it dictates, while Arab and Islamic countries remain in a state of need and dependency.

In contrast, China has taken a different path, not engaging in the rhetoric of political preaching or imposing agendas, but focusing on building its own independent system, surpassing sanctions and restrictions with a long-term plan combining scientific progress and economic openness. It has invested in education, research, clean energy, and advanced technology, establishing a model based on efficiency and real production. This approach has allowed it to position itself on the international stage as a force that creates development rather than hegemony.

The Chinese policy is based on the principle of mutual benefit and the shared destiny of all humanity without political conditions or interference in the internal affairs of states. Therefore, it has gained the trust of many peoples and governments because it offers a practical model for balanced partnerships based on interests rather than dictates. Moreover, Chinese products are no longer depicted as they were by America and the West: today, in an open world, they have proven to be advanced, efficient, high-quality goods at fair prices that compete with their Western counterparts and outperform them in performance and cost, making them the natural choice for countries looking for real development rather than debts and conditional aid.

The Middle East stands today at the heart of this global technological and economic conflict. While Washington seeks to tighten its grip on maritime corridors, energy resources, and markets to suffocate China and limit its progress, China is quietly and intelligently extending bridges of cooperation through the "Belt and Road Initiative," which connects Asia with Europe and Africa through giant infrastructure, energy, and trade projects. This initiative does not seek to monopolize influence but to create a network of common interests that guarantees development and stability for all parties.

Arab countries must realize that blind alliance with Washington no longer brings security or prosperity, but rather maintains a state of dependency on the colonial West. The past decades have proven that the United States grants its allies only illusory protection in exchange for dependency while keeping them distant from advanced technology and true production sources and exploiting their savings and natural resources. In contrast, China today represents a historic opportunity for Arabs to build a new model based on cooperation rather than subjugation, based on knowledge transfer rather than monopolization.

Arab openness to China is not merely a political choice but an economic and strategic necessity. Partnership with Beijing means access to advanced technology at reasonable prices, real investments in infrastructure, and opportunities for development in renewable energy and local industry. China does not impose political dictates; it offers its expertise in exchange for an equitable partnership that safeguards the interests of both parties.

China, for its part, must view the Middle East not just as a consumer market but as a strategic region central to reshaping the international system. An active Chinese presence in the region will provide it with political and economic depth that balances American hegemony and creates a new path for global development. To achieve this, Beijing needs to enhance its investments in technology, energy, and transportation and to activate its diplomatic and media power to clarify its vision of a world based on cooperation and mutual respect and to counter Western narratives that seek to distort its image.

The world today stands on the brink of a new system in which the balance of power is shifting. The United States is trying by all means to maintain its historical privileges, even at the cost of global stability, while China is advancing steadily towards a fairer and more balanced model. Amid this transformation, the Middle East has a rare opportunity to align with the future rather than the past, with a partner that produces rather than plunders, that respects rather than dominates, and that shares rather than dictates.

China is not an ideological alternative to the West but a strategic choice for those who want to forge their own development. Betting on it is not a gamble but a realistic assessment for those who hold the reins of tomorrow. The world is changing, and those who do not keep pace with this transformation will find themselves on the margins while the rising powers shape the contours of the future.